Despot Imran considers himself  the Constitution : Marriyum

0
388

            ISLAMABAD,:Minister for Information and Broadcasting Marriyum Aurangzeb said on Tuesday that Pakistan Tehreek-Insaf leadership should reply questions regarding prohibited foreign funding case.

In her reaction to Chaudhry Fawad ‘s statement, she said that Imran Khan abused and threatened to anyone who asked any question.

 She alleged that Imran Khan wanted that  everyone should believe in  his lies and he should not be held accountable for corruption.

 “They want questions of their own choice and answers of their own wish”, she said while taking a dig on PTI.

 “Imran wants match of his choice, umpire and players of his choice where decisions are made on his will”, she remarked.

 Imran Khan wanted judges  of his choice,  lawyers of his choice and  verdicts of his will,  she said.

 The minister while denouncing the PTI chairman, said that Imran did  not believe in the constitution or law,as  he considered himself as the Constitution.

She said it was Imran’s mindset that if any  court asked a question, it should be insulted and ridiculed and  allegation of  a conspiracy should be levelled.

 Marriyum Aurangzeb said it was part of Imran’s policy that if the Election Commission asked  any question,time should be wasted  for 8 years and  then threaten it to besiege it.

 Similarly if media raised any  questions on his government performance, his reaction was to close televison channels, programs and ban newspaper columns, he  filed lawsuits against them  and introduced black laws and  put media persons in jails and they were physically attacked.

 The minister said that if political opponents raised questions, it was strategy of despot Imran to put them in death row, violate the sanctity of the  the four walls.

She said that Imran Khan used every institution, every authority for political revenge against political opponents, then started  the slogans  the state of Madinah.

 For four years, despite all his  efforts, he was not been able to prove one allegation against a single political opponent, and he has not been able to give a single proof, except making baseless allegations.