ISLAMABAD, JUL 16 /DNA/ – The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) is facing a damaging internal rebellion as senior leaders in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa systematically undermine Imran Khan’s Senate nominations, replacing his handpicked technocrat candidates with wealthy businessmen, despite explicit instructions from the imprisoned party founder, a key figure in PTI’s history and ideology.
The controversy centres on Khan’s nomination of Azam Swati and former Inspector General Syed Irshad Hussain for technocrat positions among PTI’s finalized Senate candidates of seven general seats, two women’s seats, and two technocrat positions. However, influential KPK figures have launched a coordinated effort to substitute these qualified nominees with wealthy businessmen as candidates, exploiting Khan’s inability to intervene from Adiala Jail.
Party insiders reveal that one proposed businessman maintains membership in a religious political party, raising serious questions about ideological alignment with PTI’s political agenda. The second candidate reportedly lacks loyalty to PTI’s core principles, further intensifying concerns among party workers who view these developments as a fundamental betrayal of the movement’s anti-corruption foundation.
The timing proves particularly destructive as Senate election lobbying intensifies, with party leadership appearing fractured over candidate selection processes. Social media platforms have erupted with objections from PTI workers, who argue that prioritizing wealthy candidates over qualified professionals directly contradicts the party’s founding commitment to meritocracy and transparent governance.
Political analysts suggest that this internal discord reflects broader challenges facing the PTI, as regional leaders increasingly prioritize their interests over Khan’s directives. The controversy not only threatens to erode PTI’s credibility among supporters who have already witnessed multiple leadership changes and internal conflicts since Khan’s imprisonment but also raises serious concerns about the party’s future.
The dispute over technocrat nominations signals a potential shift in PTI’s internal power dynamics, with KPK leadership asserting greater autonomy in candidate selection. This development could significantly compromise the party’s ability to present a united front during crucial Senate elections, potentially affecting its performance in the upper house of parliament, where every seat carries substantial legislative weight.
For a party once rooted in reform, the erosion of internal accountability may prove more damaging than any external opposition. If left unresolved, this internal revolt may set a precedent for future defiance across provincial chapters, weakening Khan’s grip over party discipline, party sources said.
The coming days may prove pivotal in determining whether PTI can reassert its founding principles or succumb to the very political culture it vowed to resist.
