Govt allies walks out from NA

0
120

Govt ally PPP walks

out from NA over

 continued absence

of ministers

Faisal Sheikh

ISLAMABAD: Lawmakers in both houses of parliament had expressed outrage last week over the continued absence of the ministers as Deputy Speaker Ghulam Mustafa Shah termed it a “disgrace” to the parliament and dec­lared that they would not hold NA proceedings if the ministers would not be present in the house. Shah had also announced that they would write a letter to the prime minister to apprise him about the situation.

A similar scenario had unfolded in the Senate where Chairman Yousuf Raza Gilani had to defer several agenda items due to the ministers’ absence.

Unmoved over the criticism on them, the ministers had spent a busy day in various activities outside parliament throughout the day which was evident from the press releases issued by the media managers of their respective ministries to the newspapers and TV channels, requesting them to give prominent coverage.

The same situation was no different in today’s NA session with only Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar present among the treasury benches from the federal ministers during question hour.

The first of many, PPP MNA Asad Niazi pointed the above out, lamenting that it was “unfortunate” that only Tarar was present to answer questions.

Later, PPP lawmaker Naveed Qamar lashed out: “The problem is that do they (secretaries and advisers) only come here to complete their attendance? That they give any illogical response and then say [the question] has passed and we should move on.

“You have given the ministers a blank cheque that there is no need for them to come because parliamentary secretaries are present and they are equal to a minister. This is not the way that you should run the assembly.”

Disparaging the responses from the parliamentary secretaries to questions asked so far, Qamar said it was “insulting to sit in a house where we get these kinds of answers”.

Praising the responses from some of the secretaries, he said others were “not properly briefed and have no clue about the subject and you accept that as an answer? I fail to understand how we are going to enhance the stature of this house.